Luna Perez v Sturgis Public Schools - Case Summary

University / Undergraduate
Modified: 22nd Feb 2024
Wordcount: 526 words


Law Expert

Disclaimer: This US Supreme Court case summary was produced by one of our law experts as an informational resource for law students and professionals researching case law. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of

Cite This

Legal Case Summary

Summary: A landmark case involving the public school district's responsibility in ensuring students' safety, while they are on their way to school.


Luna Perez was an 11-year-old student at a Sturgis Public School whose parents filed a lawsuit on her behalf. Luna was injured on her way to school when she was hit by a speeding car at an intersection near her school. The intersection was known to be dangerous, with several accidents being reported in the past. Luna's parents argue that the public school failed its duty to ensure Luna's safety by not implementing measures such as traffic control signals or security personnel to monitor the intersection during school hours.


The case revolved around the question of whether Sturgis Public Schools had a duty of care over its students, particularly while they were on their way to school. In addition, the case questioned whether the public school is liable for failing to address the known safety risks at the intersection near the school.


This case is significant because it expands the scope of a public school's duty of care. It establishes the school's responsibility to be vigilant about features that could present potential risks to students and not just within their school premises. The ruling is likely to affect other schools with dangerous roads or intersections within a certain radius of their premises.


The court ruled in favour of Luna’s parents, indicating that the school did have an obligation to ensure students' safety on their way to school and the school failed to deploy appropriate traffic control measures considering the past incidents at the intersection. The court based its decision on similar cases where an entity's duty of care was expanded due to knowledge of potential harms and failing to take necessary precautions.


  • Luna Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools et al. (2023). Westlaw Case Law.
  • Slattery, D. (2023). Schools' Duty to Ensure Student Safety: A Case Study. Law Review Journal.

Journalist Brief

Luna Perez, an 11-year-old student, was involved in a car accident on her way to a Sturgis Public School. Her parents sued the school district, stating that the school did not take adequate measures to ensure safety at a known dangerous intersection near the school. The Court ruled in favour of Luna's parents, stressing that schools are responsible for students' safety even outside their grounds, especially in scenarios where the risks are known and ignored. This decision could impact other schools in terms of enhanced off-premise safety responsibilities.


What was the basis of Luna Perez's lawsuit against her school?

Answer: The lawsuit argued that the school had a responsibility to ensure student safety at a known dangerous intersection near the school and failed to do so.

What was the court's decision?

Answer: The court sided with Luna's parents, ruling that schools have a duty of care that extends outside the school grounds.

How might this case affect other schools?

Answer: This decision could cause other public schools to take necessary measures to ensure safety of students near their premises, acknowledging the expanded scope of their duty of care.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Get Academic Help Today!

Encrypted with a 256-bit secure payment provider