Asheton v. Asheton - Case Summary

University / Undergraduate
Modified: 16th Mar 2024
Wordcount: 511 words


Law Expert

Disclaimer: This US Supreme Court case summary was produced by one of our law experts as an informational resource for law students and professionals researching case law. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of

Cite This

Legal Case Summary

Summary: 1760 Pennsylvania case regarding issues of land rights, property inheritance, and estate division between brothers.


In ASHETON v. ASHETON, 1 U.S. 4 (1760), John and Job Asheton are brothers involved in a dispute over the division of their late father's estate. John argued that he was entitled to the entirety of their father's real property based on primogeniture, a practice which gives all asset rights to the eldest son. Job, on the other hand, argued for an equal division of the estate.


The primary issue in the case involved the legitimacy of primogeniture in the context of a will's stipulations. More specifically, the determination was needed as to whether the father's will, which was arguably vague in its wording, meant to exclude Job from receiving a portion of the estate. Beyond this, the court needed to consider the legislative acts and commonly accepted practices pertaining to property rights and inheritance.


ASHETON v. ASHETON demonstrated how early American courts interpreted wills and treated the practice of primogeniture. The Court’s decision reflected the broader shift in colonial America towards equitable asset divisions, helping to dismantle entrenched practices favoring the eldest son. This case serves a historical precedent that influenced future court decisions in matters of estate division and land inheritence.


The Court decided in favour of Job Asheton, asserting that the will was not explicit in communicating primogeniture intent and the accepted interpretation followed the principle of equitable division of assets amongst descendants. Therefore, the Court held that John Asheton was not entitled to the entirety of the estate. This contributed to the ongoing movement away from the primogeniture system within the United States.


  • ASHETON v. ASHETON, 1 U.S. 4 (1760)
  • 1 U.S. Cas. Law, at 4.

Journalist Brief

In this protracted sibling legal battle from 1760, John and Job Asheton argued over their deceased father's estate. John claimed that as the eldest son, he should get the entire estate, a system known as 'primogeniture'. However, Job advocated for a fair division. The Court sided with Job, indicating that the father's will didn't explicitly support primogeniture and that the estate should be equitably shared. This contributed to dismantling the system that traditionally favoured older sons, marking a significant moment in American legal history.


What is the case ASHETON v. ASHETON about?

Answer: The case is about a dispute between two brothers over the inheritance of their father's estate. One brother argued for primogeniture (entire estate to eldest son), while the other argued for equal division.

What was the Court's decision in ASHETON v. ASHETON?

Answer: The Court decided in favour of equal inheritance, dismissing the claim of the elder brother for the whole estate.

What is the significance of ASHETON v. ASHETON?

Answer: The case exemplifies the broader shift away from the practice of primogeniture in colonial America, establishing a precedent for equitable divisions of estates.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Get Academic Help Today!

Encrypted with a 256-bit secure payment provider