Trump v Kemp - Case Summary

University / Undergraduate
Modified: 22nd Feb 2024
Wordcount: 670 words


Law Expert

Disclaimer: This legal case summary was produced by one of our law experts as an informational resource for law students and professionals researching case law. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of

Cite This

Legal Case Summary

Summary: Lawsuit in Georgia challenging the presidential election results, which was dismissed due to lack of standing.


Filed on December 4, 2020, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Trump v. Kemp was a lawsuit initiated by U.S. President Donald Trump's legal team. The lawsuit targeted Georgia Governor Brian Kemp along with other state officials. The lawsuit aimed to overturn Georgia's 2020 presidential election results, claiming widespread voter fraud (Stern, 2020).

The lawsuit incorporated multiple theories, unsupported by evidence, about how vote fraud might have occurred. Despite attempts to substantiate these allegations, the Trump team failed to produce compelling evidence in the court (Cornell Law School, 2020).


The primary issue in Trump v Kemp was standing—the legal right to initiate a lawsuit. The lawsuit claimed widespread voter fraud, vouched for an election do-over, and submitted that the defendants violated the Electors and Elections Clauses of the U.S. Constitution.

An additional issue was the dilution of lawful votes due to the alleged unconstitutional inclusion of unlawful votes, thereby violating voters' rights to Equal Protection under the Fourteenth Amendment.


Trump v Kemp was part of a broader effort to challenge the 2020 Presidential Election results but ended up reinforcing the integrity of the electoral process. While the Trump team alleged voter fraud, Judge Grimberg's opinion reiterated the general principle that such extraordinary relief requires clear and convincing evidence.

This case may serve as precedent for future cases about electoral procedures or allegations, implying high evidentiary standards for extraordinary relief (University of California, Hastings College of the Law, 2021).


Judge Steven D. Grimberg dismissed the case stating President Trump and his legal team lacked standing to challenge Georgia's election process under the circumstances. He ruled that their allegations of unconstitutional actions were unsupported, and any harm was speculative at best.

Judge Grimberg also explained that the relief requested, to decertify the election results, was extreme and not in the public interest, considering the democratic principle of respecting the will of the voters (Bauer, 2020).


  • Bauer, M. ( 2020), 'Trump’s Legal Path to Overturn Election Shrinks With Series of Court Losses', Bloomberg.
  • Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute (2020), 'Trump v. Kemp', Legal Information Institute.
  • Stern, M. (2020), 'A Federal Judge Just Tossed Out Another of Trump's Election Lawsuits', Slate.
  • University of California, Hastings College of the Law, (2021), 'Presidential Election Litigation', Center for Competitive Democracy.

Journalist Brief

Trump v Kemp was a legal case brought by then-President Donald Trump, contesting Georgia's 2020 presidential election results. The Trump team alleged widespread voter fraud and constitutional violations in processing votes. However, they failed to provide compelling evidence. The Judge, Steven D. Grimberg, dismissed the case, stating Trump's team had no legal standing to challenge the process and their claims lacked evidence. The judge also stated the requested resolution - to decertify the election results was not in the public's interest.


What was the Trump v Kemp case about?

Answer: It was about former President Trump's attempt to overturn Georgia's 2020 presidential election results, alleging voter fraud and constitutional violations.

What was the court's decision in Trump v Kemp?

Answer: The court dismissed the case, citing a lack of substantial evidence and stating that Trump's legal team lacked legal standing to challenge the election results.

What is the broader implication of the Trump v Kemp case?

Answer: This case, as part of many attempts to challenge the 2020 election, ended up reinforcing the integrity of the election process, and sets a precedent for the high burden of proof for extraordinary relief in future cases.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Get Academic Help Today!

Encrypted with a 256-bit secure payment provider