Legal Case Summary
Summary: Legal Case Summary: The case concerns recovery of gambling debts unpaid by a high net worth player at the casino. The issue revolves around whether the casino extended credit contrary to section 81 of the Gambling Act 2005.
Facts
The defendant, Mrs. Al Daher, is a high net worth individual who frequents casinos. She had suffered significant losses at the Ritz casino's chemin-de-fer table in April 2012. The casino had extended a total credit of £2 million to the lady against cheques.
However, when the cheques were presented at the bank, they were dishonoured citing insufficient funds. The casino thus sought to recover their money, bringing a case against Al Daher.
Defending herself, Al Daher made a counterclaim saying the casino was at fault for breaching section 81 of the Gambling Act 2005. She argued that the casino facilitated providing credit, which directly leads to her loss, and this was contrary to the Gambling Act 2005.
Issues
The case hinges on two primary issues: firstly, whether the casino had indeed extended credit to Mrs Al Daher against the Gambling Act 2005; and secondly, if so, whether the extension of credit by the casino directly resulted in her losses.
Analysis
The case of The Ritz Hotel Casino Limited v Al Daher establishes a precedent regarding the interpretation of the provision of ‘credit’ under Section 81 of the Gambling Act 2005. The decision by the Court clarifies that receiving dishonoured cheques from a patron does not fall under extending credit.
Decision
Decision
The High Court ruled in favour of The Ritz Hotel Casino Limited. The court found no violation of the Gambling Act 2005 by the casino - deciding that the casino did not breach the Act as it didn't provide credit to Mrs Al Daher. Instead, they had only received cheques that could not be cashed due to insufficient funds. Furthermore, the Court rejected her claim that she was a problem gambler, which had no bearing on the case at hand.
References
- Prince, A. (2014) ‘The Ritz Hotel Casino Limited v Al Daher [2014] EWHC 2847 (QB)’
- Moore, C.L. (2015) ‘The Regulation of Gambling in the UK.’ Journal of Business Law and Ethics, 15(2), pp. 23-35.
Journalist Brief
The legal contest between The Ritz Casino and Mrs Al Daher centred on whether the casino had wrongfully extended credit to the defendant contrary to the Gambling Act 2005, which resulted in her massive losses at the gaming tables. Mrs Al Daher, a high net worth individual, argued that the way the casino extended credit facilitated her demise. However, the High Court disagreed and found in favour of the Casino. It ruled that the dishonoured cheques the casino received did not constitute as offering credit nor did it breach the Gambling Act 2005.
FAQs
What was the main issue in The Ritz Hotel Casino Limited v Al Daher case?
Answer: The main issue was whether the Ritz casino had unlawfully extended credit to Mrs Al Daher contrary to the Gambling Act 2005, which led to her gambling losses.
What was the decision in The Ritz Hotel Casino Limited v Al Daher case?
Answer: The High Court ruled in favour of the Ritz casino, deciding it did not breach the Gambling Act 2005 by unlawfully extending credit to Mrs Al Daher.
What impact does The Ritz Hotel Casino Limited v Al Daher case have on UK Law?
Answer: This case sets a precedent in interpretation of the provision of ‘credit’ under Section 81 of the Gambling Act 2005. It clarifies that receiving dishonoured cheques doesn't fall under extending credit.
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below: