Salomon v Salomon - Case Summary

Legal Case Summary

Facts

Mr. Aron Salomon made leather boots and shoes in his own name. Later, he incorporated his business into a limited company, A Salomon & Co Ltd. He, his wife, and their five children were the only shareholders. They each held one share. The remaining 20,001 shares were held by Mr. Salomon.

The company purchased Mr. Salomon's business for a sum above it worth, with the remaining amount in debentures. Soon after, the company ran into financial difficulties and debts far exceeding its assets.

The subsequent liquidation of the company resulted in Mr. Salomon claiming his status as a secured creditor, claiming to have the same rights as other creditors in terms of recovering his debts.

Issues

Can a company, once incorporated, be viewed as a separate legal entity from its shareholders and owners? Do shareholders have the same rights as other creditors in situations of liquidation?

Analysis

The Salomon v Salomon case is a cornerstone of company law, establishing the principle of corporate personality. This landmark ruling affirmed that upon incorporation, a new and separate artificial entity comes into existence. The judgment in this case continues to be law and is applied daily by Courts in the UK and across the world.

Decision

The House of Lords unanimously reversed the decision of the Court of Appeal. They upheld Mr. Salomon's appeal and his status as a secured creditor.

They asserted that on valid incorporation, a company is generally considered a separate legal entity from its shareholders, with its own rights and liabilities.

References

• Sealy, L., and Worthington, S., 2013. Cases and materials in company law. Oxford University Press.
• Easterbrook, F. H., and Fischel, D. R., 1985. Limited liability and the corporation. University of Chicago Law Review, 52(1), pp.89-117.

---

Journalist Brief

In Salomon v Salomon, a man transferred his business into a company of which he and his immediate family were the sole shareholders. Following the company's bankruptcy, the court had to decide whether the company was a separate legal entity. The House of Lords pronounced that a company, upon its valid incorporation, becomes a separate legal entity from its shareholders. This landmark decision has been a foundation stone in corporate law, demonstrating that a company has its own rights and liabilities which are distinct from those of its shareholders.

FAQs

What was the ultimate decision in Salomon v Salomon?

Answer: The ultimate decision in Salomon v Salomon was that the company was a separate legal entity and Mr. Salomon was a secured creditor, thus having rights to recover his debts.

Why is Salomon v Salomon significant?

Answer: Salomon v Salomon is significant because it established the precedent that incorporated companies are separate legal entities from their shareholders, regardless of the degree of control exercised by the latter.

What is the main principle from Salomon v Salomon?

Answer: The main principle from Salomon v Salomon is that upon valid incorporation, a company is generally considered a separate legal entity from its shareholders, with its own rights and liabilities.